HappySqurriel said:
Wasn't New Jersey a state that had among the highest taxes, spending, debts and deficits per capita in the United States before Chris Christie became govenor? Doesn't this mean that the state needed agressive spending cuts to balance the budget before they hit a crisis point? How could the budget deficit going to be reduced to a reasonable level without agressive cuts to education?
I could be wrong, but I believe that Chirs Christie was actually heavily supported because he is the kind of person people seek out to lead when difficut and unpopular decisions have to be made. |
New Jersey has the worst state debt-to-person ratio in America by large margins. They were projected to be more than $10 billion in debt for 2011, despite being much smaller than the other states in trouble like Illinois and California.
Here is my question for Evolution:
Knowing that your state has an annual budget shortfall of over $11.7 billion USD in 2011, and its a deficit that MUST be fixed, or go into bankruptcy, what would you cut, and where? Give exact examples on how you would of cut it where Christie did not.
From an outsider (Ohioan) view, Christie is fantastic. He's not popular with some people, but he is doing what absolutely must be done to reform the worst state in America. It is going to be hard, because he's having to weed out decades of corruption and bad practices, which are making people mad. However, if he did not do it now, 10-20 years from now, New Jersey would of gone the Greek route and went into insolvency. At that point, people would be far, FAR worse off.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.







