richardhutnik said:
If the data is available to be reviewed, then why would the article need to bring it up? The article was a wake up call article, and not a research piece. The unpublished part comes in that is now what the government reports. To get too hung up on the minutia here is to miss the point. |
So they're just going to claim there's unpublished data in government reports. Whoop-de-fing-do. Last time I checked, that sort of thing is called a rumor and not proof of anything. You generally need evidence of some sort. You know who also claim a lot of stuff without having any proof to accomplish some agenda? Conspiracy theorists.
As I said, if they really did find unpublished data, it's their responsibility to publish it, not just claim they found it.








