Soleron said:
It is possible to consume alcohol at quantities with no health consequences and no serious psychological impact. This isn't possible with most of the banned drugs, and indeed tobacco. The safe level is zero, there is no possible benefit to the user, and the cost to society in missed work hours, behaviour under the influence of drugs and healthcare (especially in socialised-heathcare countries) is very large. They are harming many other people than the consumer, and there is no level of drug-taking that doesn't. Tobacco should be classed with the most serious drugs we have based on the health risk. Only reason it isn't is lack of political will. |
That's a problem with socialized healthcare and thinking. Not Drugs.
Peoples rights to do what they want to their own body are being infringed opon by the state because people are tied together too much due to healthcare. Of course, the US doesn't even really have this excuse.
Using drugs caosts missed hours and healtcare, so does eating fast food. Should that be illegal? So does watching tv. So does, almost everything that isn't "working". The state has no "right" to force people to work or make good choices or any number of other things.
Way to solve the problem? Penalize people who use drugs in socialized medicine. Charge them more or cover less.








