theprof00 on 20 September 2010
mhsillen said:
Very interesting but i consider only the individuals who part of the war The generals listed had their way of warfare and this new bomb was not part of it. Patton especially. He loved war he was a war scholar ate drank slept war. So his opposition was not because he thought it was to brutal it was just not how he liked killing people |
that's an interesting interpretation to say the least.
I just don't understand what's so deceptive about it. The commander in chief, the major generals, and lots of other higher ups were against it and said the war was already over. It was only the air-force leader that was really pro-bomb.
