rocketpig said:
routsounmanman said:
mhsillen said:
routsounmanman said:
I can't believe what I'm hearing from some people! US went to war with Afghanistan and Iraq to "combat terrorism". With your logic, them nuking Los Angeles would have been a great resolve to end the war...
Seriously, nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki should be considered nothing less than terrorism and crimes of war, there's no spinning that.
|
oh bad usa bad
I'm japan was so Innocent
Do you know history?
|
I never said the Japanese were good folks. Every member of the Axis, and many of the Allies actually went on a killing spree during WW2, civilians included. You just can't claim that the US went on a crusade and the bombing was justifiable, no way.
They were crimes of war, end of story.
|
Then everyone in WWII was guilty of crimes of war. Dresden, London, Leningrad, Tokyo, Nanking, continue ad nauseum.
It was a war where carpet bombing entire cities and civilians was commonplace. It was an ugly war and ugly things had to be done to finish it.
|
I completely agree, most of WW2 was a war crime, genocide. Yet, the title of this thread reads : "what's your point in the Nagasaki and Hiroshima bombings?". The answer to that can be no less than unjustifiable war crime.
