By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Squilliam said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Squilliam said:

I suppose it actually makes sense in a screwed up way. Rather than selling a laptop with X processor and a laptop with X Y processor. They can instead simply sell the laptop with X and let people unlock to X Y. You were always buying a processor capable of X Y when you bought an X laptop, you just could never enable the Y. Depending on how they charge for this it may lead to cheaper performance laptops as they tend to whack on quite a large manufacturer margin as you go up the range.


The problem with that is the tech is already on the chip, and you still have to sell it at a profit.

So it's essentially paying full price for less on the chip.


Nope. Its the same as before.

Before: They sell you a chip which is cut down but you can't restore the features.

Now: They sell you a chip which is cut down but you can restore the features.


Those features were defective, so they can't restore them anyway.

Plus you're missing my point. If you want a less powerful chip, you would save more money actually buying a less powerful chip. You would be ripped off buying a chip like this, as the features you don't intend to use still need to be paid for in order for the chip to make a profit.

So don't tell me it's the same as before.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs