Looks like my message didn't click here. I would say several things:
* Upon what basis does Dawkins have a basis to make a moral argument against anything, because his personal preferences, wrapped around by intellect, gives him the ability to show moral outrage? Would he of also gone off against the ancient Greeks in regards to their practice of men and boys? And would he of done it in their day? To cry hypocrisy as the basis of your moral argument is to not bring anything of your own to the debate.
* In regards to Hitler being a Christian or not, I would ask people to look it up themselves, but also ask people in what way Aryianism is compatible with Christianity.
Please show how this is compatible with the Christian message:
http://aryanism.net/religion/christianity/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DS_Vwzsd854
If that is not compatible with Christianity, then how can one say that Hitler was anything remotely resembling a disciple of Jesus?
