MaxwellGT2000 said:
leatherhat said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
leatherhat said:
Because motion control games are a joke. The most precise motion controller will still be far less so than a regular gamepad. Like the killzone example you used, the mere act of making a gesture can screw your aim up, as opposed to a more simple and intuitive button press that lets you keep full control.
|
Or you could have a sub controller that has motion sensors in it and it work perfectly and have the best controls that isn't a Mouse and Keyboard and even then with the sub controller you have advantages to the keyboard mostly being analog control lol
|
So then you move the motion to another part, it can still mess things up. As far as precision goes motion gaming is a long ways away from gamepads.
|
Wait have you even played with these devices? You seem very ill informed stating what you just did...
|
No I bought my wii and never touched it. I just like to burn 250 bucks sometimes. Motion control is imprecise. There has been no game or hardware that has ever proven me wrong.
If we're talking fps motion controls might be slightly better than dual analog, but its a negligible amount, and they are still far below m kb. Which contrary to popular opinion does count in these format wars. Every other genre besides fps is inferior on a motion system compared to m kb or a gamepad. Its because of the lack of precision and lack of diversity and innovation among motion control systems.
Where are my plus signs?
