The Official Halo: Reach review thread

[ConnorJCP]

selnor said:

Jordahn said:

selnor said:

Not to sound like some sore fanboy.

Reach destroys previous Halo games. And is the best MP shooter on consoles right now. It's rediculous how much this game has. And it's gonna Meta as the lowest of the Halos? ( Not including ODST ).

Something is seriously broken.

All my friends are Halo lovers. And everyone of us agree it's by far the best Halo.

I guess the 15 mill LT sales will say the real score though. Consumers who stay with a franchise for 4 games and continue to come back shows a quality like no other.

To use loving something as justification that somethiing is inherently good is broken thinking.

Halo 1 2 and 3 scored well because the reviewers like Halo. Halo Reach is the best of the bunch.

It's plain stupid to have a website state a game is the best FPS experience. And then give it an 8. There are 2 reviews that have done with Reach on Meta. Yet the same site gave MW1 and 2 a 9? But yet they say Reach is better.

Yes reviews are broken.

Any Halo fan cannot understand how much better Reach is than previous games unless they have played it. The set pieces are rediculously good with the sheer amount of enemies and carnage of war going on.

After playing it extensively, it's laughable to see the meta.

Selnor, is it ok if linked me to some of the reviews you've done in your career as a game reviewer?
Unless you aren't one.....but thats not true because you know all this stuff about games and reviewing them.
Nice opinion by the way. IMO the reviews are spot on.