By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mr Puggsly said:
libellule said:
Mr Puggsly said:
libellule said:

yeah, you are right for the RRoD too.

But, your PS3 analogy is dumb too. Is it written "play PS2 games" on the PS3 box ? If yes, you are right, if no, then u are wrong

Well with that logic. I can also say the Reach box says nothing about co-op campaign.

u buy PS3 to play PS3 games or play BR movie !

u buy Reach to play Reach ! No mentionning what you need to play Reach will be very unfair !

Some PS3s can play PS2 games... some don't. It should be probably be clarified. God forbid someone buys a PS3 and thinks they have the ability to play the fantastic library PS2 offers.

Well you CAN play Reach. You can play the campaign a lone or in split screen. No hard drive required. Whats your point?

As I said before. We can keep going round and round.

Except that the online co-op campaign of HaloR is a part of what you pay for, that is why it makes sense to precise on the box what are the requirement you need to play it (and it seems it is precised)

To put it differently : you buy a 360 to play a 360 games. BUT, you will miss some games features if you go for the cheapest model despite no being fully aware that HDD may be required for some games. And I m not talking about minor features.

The PS3 was never able to fully play the PS2 game and that is why, on the box, there is not written "can play PS2 games" (http://www.amazon.com/PlayStation-3-160-GB/dp/B003VUO6H4/ref=sr_tr_1?ie=UTF8&s=videogames&qid=1284653668&sr=8-1 tell me where you can read : "can play PS2 games")

Again, I dont have check on the PS3 box itself. But I higly doubt sony has written "can play PS2 games" meaning ... they dont lie.

I know, this discussion is useless and endless ...



Time to Work !