Im honestly really surprised that the fact Live is paid for hasnt come up in reviews considering how immensely good Halos MP is. I mean im not even argueing that its too expensive or anything because its really not in the grand scheme of things, but it seems that if so much emphasis is made on that aspect and its actually an added cost it would be either mentioned or brought up more.
Lets say the game is 10 missions but Bungie announces 10 extra missions to be released every month for 10 months for 3 bucks each prior to the launch, i think thatd be an important factor in reviews, yet considering how important Halo's online aspect is the cost of Live is never really discussed. I feel the cost of ODST brought those reviews down but Live is never mentioned.
Personally i dont feel it should be, but just something about "reviews" being broken. Theres definately a lot broken, the fact that one of the most fun games and likely the best selling HD console game of this Gen gets "only" a 93 surely isnt one of them though.
Id argue games like GTA4 and others prove its broken, an amazing game like Reach geting mid to low 90's is where these types of games should be, imo.
