| dsister said: It's like this. You don't give something a higher score because of something that not everyone has access to makes it better. Just like how Naznatips gave a lower score to the 360 version of DAO, although if you install the game on the hard drive it plays the same. Not everyone has the ability to do install so it would be unfair to give it a higher score because of that. If I were to want this game I would probably check metacritic really quickly to see which version to get. Even though I don't have Move I would come out thinking that it was better. Which is wrong!. They are the exact same without Move and should be judged that way |
I dont agree here. I dont think a reviewer should judge which features people will or will not use. The feature is there, so review it. Making abstraction of Move is as lazy as making abstraction theres an install option. Even if you dont give it a better score, a good reviewer should at least talk about the features that are there and how they work. Multiplayer requires internet right. Some people dont have or dont use internet. Is that a reason to not review the online multiplayer aspect of a game? Obviously no, let your readers decide for themself if that aspect is important or not.
You said: "If I were to want this game I would probably check metacritic really quickly to see which version to get. Even though I don't have Move I would come out thinking that it was better."
Well, it is better, it offers something more (dont know if R.U.S.E PS3 runs better then Xbox though). Plus, in this case, the something more isnt negligable either. What you should do is read some reviews to see what are the differences. If you dont mind the differences (in this case Move) then grab whatever version you want. Dont you think so?
