sapphi_snake said:
TheRealMafoo said:
If you think child pornography doesn't directly harm anyone, you might want to see someone. That's a strange position to take on that subject. Sure, looking at it doesn't. But to look at it, it had to be created. Nothing bad had to happen in order for this man to have a book and a match.
I think what people need to focus on with respect to possible violence, is the people who would cause the violence, and why they would cause it.
The problem is not that 50 morons somewhere want to burn a stack of papers. The problem is that means so much to someone, they would kill over it.
Your idea to bring peace to with the Western World and Islam is to make sure every one of the 300 million Americans walk on eggshells, and cater to the most violent of a religion?
Fuck that. I say that man, and every other American, has the freedom to exercise there rights, and if it pisses someone else off enough for them to inflict violence, the solution is to fix whomever is violent.
|
What about animated child pornography?
|
In the US animated child pornography in and of itself, is not against the law. It's against the law to transmit it across state lines, or distribute it on a computer, but it's not against the law for you to own it.
It's one of those things were I would worry about someone if they had it, but then again I kill hundreds of people a day in video games, and it's not like I want to kill anyone in real life.
As long as the people who own this material never inflict anything on anyone else, I say who gives a shit?
