Icyedge said:
High logic? I know your being sarcastic but honestly it was very simple logic. You said evolution was the correct term. It cannot be a rip off if its an evolution. Now your saying it isnt an evolution? You were the one to bring that term. I thought it was a good term myself. It has the same basic functions (totally agree here), but then add 3D positioning and the camera features to those basic features, which I think is an evolution. About your song example, its a pretty interesting example indeed. Though, the question isnt, is rip off quantitative or not. The meaning of the word is clear enough on this subject. The question is: where does being a rip off start or stop? What your talking about isnt quantitativity, its relativity. |
oh no I still say it's an evolution, pardon my bad writting :p, i see the merit of the move and the big advantage of tracking the object rather than the object tracking the TV. It is indeed a pretty big evolution.
we're not disagreeing on the object... just on the vocabulary =)
@ bolded: that's exactly where our conflict is. I say if any part is based on an other product, then the term rip off can be applied. You disagree. I doubt we'll change each other's minds.
to me, going from the idea of a ball on a stick being tracked by the camera to a ball on a wiimote is pretty much ripping off the wiimote. An argument is the navipad (or whatever it's called), an object that seems useless for 1/2 of the move games, but an object needed to have wii like controls. They easily could have made the navipad hold a ball too... taking away the need to use 2 move controlers for some games, but that differed too much from the wiimote template I guess.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO







