By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WessleWoggle said:
sapphi_snake said:
TheRealMafoo said:

If you think child pornography doesn't directly harm anyone, you might want to see someone. That's a strange position to take on that subject. Sure, looking at it doesn't. But to look at it, it had to be created. Nothing bad had to happen in order for this man to have a book and a match.

I think what people need to focus on with respect to possible violence, is the people who would cause the violence, and why they would cause it.

The problem is not that 50 morons somewhere want to burn a stack of papers. The problem is that means so much to someone, they would kill over it. 

Your idea to bring peace to with the Western World and Islam is to make sure every one of the 300 million Americans walk on eggshells, and cater to the most violent of a religion?

Fuck that. I say that man, and every other American, has the freedom to exercise there rights, and if it pisses someone else off enough for them to inflict violence, the solution is to fix whomever is violent.

What about animated child pornography?


Uh, it's awesome?

You get a free pass for being crazy.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)