By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 10 September 2010
Edit Thread
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:


Being ignorant of PTSD isn't a personal attack.  It's just a statement that your ignorant about PTSD.

Which you are... incredibly so.  Seriously, read a book on PTSD or take a class on it if you plan to continue this conversation. 

Until you get some actual knowledge on the subject... I really am done.  You are just talking about stuff you have no idea about.  PTSD triggers all have different strengths based on locations and time.

You don't understand how a trigger would be stronger at the location of the trauma?  Really?  You shouldn't need a book for that one.

Again, you still have yet to present any proof that a significant number of people (CURRENTLY) have PTSD regarding the attacks and are only assuming what triggers those people have or do no have. You're accusations that I have no knowledge of PTSD and the fact that you concentrate on that in your replies to me, rather than back up your claims with relevant data (soruces, studies etc.) is your way of distracting from the fact that you're pulling all this out of your ass and have no concrete proof to back up those claims.

I'm glad you're "really done". I'm tired of your worthless replies.

Outside of the proof i've already given?  All you've suggested is that "many" have recovered.  How much do you think "Many" is...?  20%?

You don't have a number... all you've done is prove my point for me.

I'm not "pulling this out of my ass".  I have an actual real life degree in psychology.

Hence why I keep saying you don't know what your talking about... becuase I've actually studied it.  For grades.  Because I know what i'm talking about.   I've stopped discussing it with you, because at this point it'd be like a Bioengineering graduate having an argument about bioengineering with me.  I just don't have the frame of refrence or understanding to even had said arguement.  It would be pointless for him to argue with me.

 

What it comes down to, is you think people should be assholes, just to be assholes.  Which is something I don't know why anyone would agree with.  When given the choice to make two equal choices, one of which is much more assholish and inconsiderate to people then the other, it's completely asnine to refuse to do it simply because it wasn't your orignal plan.

 

Heck, on a personal level, I don't give a damn.  Partly because I never really cared about 9/11.  It was tragic and i felt bad for the victims but it didn't feel any different then any other terrorist attacks that go on, be it suicide bombings in Israel, different liberation groups attacking or whatever. 

I just simply see a case where one group is needlessly antagonizing people who've been traumitized by an attack for no good reason.  The fact that some people actually think people shouldn't be criticized for that is just... stupid.