Kasz216 said:
Yeah... I don't think you understand what statistics are. you said you had statistics that proved it was irrelevent and harmful to the advancement of human civilization. You haven't proven the first, nor even attempted at proving the second... proving you are full of it.
Actually, if you look at the history of science... you'd know that if it wasn't for religion... we'd actually be worse of technologically. Science and Theology have had there minor tiffs in the past but by and large religion was more or less the biggest supporter and facilitator of Science in the world. Most nation's weren't as they were now, nations being more live a conglomeration of rival lords that may or may not of helped out each other. Only Churches really had the resources and will to focus on sceintific research. There was a time where nearly every sceintist was in fact affiliated with the Catholic Church.
|
1. I fully understand what statistics are. Don't be so patronising. I guess your a member of the some kind of God squad.
2. Err...Lourdes for one. 2 million Muslims visit the Hajj every year and each time they visit just before they see the Kabbah they pray for one wish before laying their eyes upon it. Unfortunately the Saudi authorities haven't released any data on the success to failure ratio of each prayer.
3. Unlike the statistic question you never asked me to prove how religion has been harmful to civilisation so why the complaint. Doesn't prove I'm full of it at all.
I'm fully aware of the destructive role religion has played in holding back and persecuting men and women of science for centuries and so should you unless you've been reading the Roman Catholic version of history.
Science and religion have only had 'minor' tiffs? Hah!








