zarx said:
deskpro2k3 said:
zarx said:
deskpro2k3 said:
zarx said:
you posted a list and then you posted a list lol what would you call it. I agree that exclusives are often better than multiplats (multiplats can be just as good tho), but if you are going to make that argument and post a list of exclusives at least make sure they are exclusives, otherwise your argument just looks silly lol. I mean when you are arguing exclusives are better listing multiplats just makes you look like a hypocrite, no offence meant.
|
exclusive to a console mean anything to you? the architecture of both consoles and pc is different. You should know this. I can't elaborate any better than that.
|
can you point out where you said console exclusive in your post? I can't see it. And you listed a PC exclusive in your list, and the PS3 and 360 have different architectures I really don't see what difference that makes. Unless you stipulate console exclusive it is against forum rules to claim a game that is on PC and a console is an exclusive you know.
|
Well, I tried. I thought you would understand what it is i'm trying to point out, but it seems this is going no where. Have fun.
|
I think I understand where you are coming from I just think you are wrong, I mean if you are saying being multi with PC doesn't hamper the quality of a console game, doesn't that kind of invalidate your argument that exclusives are better?
But I am happy to let it lie.
|
A multiplat will always look better on the architecture it was built on, in this case halo on pc. If you start development on a game with the idea of optimizing for multiple platforms from the ground up on a specific platform, it will always give that platform an edge on performance. It is the same for porting. That is why exclusives are better. And, that list was an example, and a bad one.
