| axumblade said: So you think he was using a poor choice of words by saying "genetic defect" and then saying that it "needs to be cured?" Both statements go together quite well actually. Both statements represent a terrible stance. What if I said that terrible spelling is a genetic defect and it needs to be wiped out? I think dtewi's statement was completely relevant based on the absurdity of SF's post. oops, I missed that part, I really got to stop speed reading through the crap on these forums, I'll be deleting all my posts reguarding this matter now O.o . Anyway, you didn't need to be so rude in pointing that out, I was cordial to you and I would have expected the same treatment in return, especially given your position on the forum. And pedophilia is NOT a sexual orientation. Sexual Orientation is based on gender preference. Pedophilia does not belong in that category because it's based on an age preference, not a gender preference. Well actually the word orientation, by it's very definition, means to align one self with a common cause, thought, or object. So yes, Pedophilia IS a sexual orientation. And I am not thin skinned. If I was thin skinned, I would be a lot less lenient with the bans I do. I could have easily thrown the book at SF when he first said that homosexuality is a "genetic defect" that needed to be cured. I did ban him for a statement later in the thread, but it was another derogatory term based around homosexuality, which was a response to it being in my mod box. |
@ Teo: Idocracy? Really? Epic fail.
