By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jlrx said:
facher83 said:
...

Simply in regards to the numbers, they are publicly released company data (ie; to investors) this is all factual, not from unofficial sources, it is simply tracking sales/profits/losses.

On your point about the successor being funded by the previous model, yes it is almost always the case.

edit: actually I see now clicking the link takes you to the first page, where it is just general nonspecific - go to the last page for the most current and detailed info. sorry.


 It's just that posting sources gives the ability to check and critisize any false or misleading data numbers.

 I'm only pushing users around here to attempt a more academic-type sourcing procedure.  Got to the last credible article/source, and don't quote or reference middle-men without that source containing an explicit reference source itself.



Numbers: Checker Players > Halo Players

Checkers Age and replayability > Halo Age and replayability

Therefore, Checkers > Halo

So, Checkers is a better game than Halo.