jlrx said:
Simply in regards to the numbers, they are publicly released company data (ie; to investors) this is all factual, not from unofficial sources, it is simply tracking sales/profits/losses. On your point about the successor being funded by the previous model, yes it is almost always the case. edit: actually I see now clicking the link takes you to the first page, where it is just general nonspecific - go to the last page for the most current and detailed info. sorry. |
It's just that posting sources gives the ability to check and critisize any false or misleading data numbers.
I'm only pushing users around here to attempt a more academic-type sourcing procedure. Got to the last credible article/source, and don't quote or reference middle-men without that source containing an explicit reference source itself.
Numbers: Checker Players > Halo Players
Checkers Age and replayability > Halo Age and replayability
Therefore, Checkers > Halo
So, Checkers is a better game than Halo.
