The point is a thread is not the same as a source-site. It has a lot of random data from non-official sources, and even then you could have data presented in different pages, responses, etc etc. It's not consistent. It's like someone from here going to another forum and quoting data presented in mine or your responses - if it doesn't include a source, it doesn't matter - and for that matter, most people try and link the last article used (not a thread topic found).
Anyway, I'm a big preacher on the idea that PS1 funded the PS2, and PS2 gained back the losses within a year.
And we have the PS2 making great money at the end of its life, and funding the PS3.... except the PS3 still hasn't returned on that previous profit and investment, making the PS2's life completely and utterly USELESS as far as the company goes financially. Still in the hole, in the red zone, by almost a billion, while the PS2 at least came out even after one year.
That is NOT good money investment.
Numbers: Checker Players > Halo Players
Checkers Age and replayability > Halo Age and replayability
Therefore, Checkers > Halo
So, Checkers is a better game than Halo.
