| Kyros said: ... " Finally, Nintendo is the only place to go for Nintendo's offerings, but what you find on the PS3 and the 360 is more often then not "not exclusive", with some exceptions." Its not exclusive to PS3 or 360 but its almost always exclusively not on the Wii. So in the end you have to buy one of the other two to play almost all great games not situated in a mushroom kingdom... |
I'm going to step out on a limb here and say most consumers in the broad market don't really want the 360/PS3 style of gaming. Oh reary? That means that while Wii may have a lot of exclusive or exclusively control-based games, I think more people in general prefer the Wii-style of games anyway. I mean, that's what's selling the console, is it not?
I resent the Mushroom Kingdom comment too.... it doesn't make that much sense. Metroid? Smash Bros.? Donkey Kong? F-Zero? Zelda? I mean, really now.... I get what you mean, but it seems a little narrow-minded to state what you just did.
And here again we have the idea that graphics - being Mushroom Kingdom/Mario graphics, makes a game stale. Does it? Then why does Mario keep selling? And, why does Mario keep making gaming leaps over the past 25 years? I don't think Nintendo, or the mass market, really honestly cares that Mario is still Mario.
Call me crazy.
Numbers: Checker Players > Halo Players
Checkers Age and replayability > Halo Age and replayability
Therefore, Checkers > Halo
So, Checkers is a better game than Halo.
