By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Carl2291 said:
Khuutra said:

Even that doesnn't work; hatmoza and I were talking about video game villains. It was you and darth who introduced the idea of incorporating villains fromo other media. The original intent of that convrsation had nothing to do with movies and everything to do with games, period.

And no, I don't think I will. Setting boundaries for conversation is impotant, but shutting down discussion is neither necessary nor desirable.

And you can use Webster's or Oxford all you want, but in the context of a story there can be but one villain, one primary antagonist against whom the hero struggles, one Big Bad Guy. Bowser is that; Goombas are not.

Okay. I can't be bothered anymore. This is annoying me. Villains is also a word. There can be multiple villains. YOU don't decide how a word is used. There can be multiple villains in a single story/game/film/whatever. But if you want to continue to argue against opinions it's up to you. Yes. This whole thing is opinion because you can't determine who IS more iconic at all.

You think Bowser is the most iconic.

I think Goomba's are just as, if not more iconic.

I think Darth Vader is more iconic than both. Probably combined.

Have fun now arguing about pointless things! I'm done :D

Here's the best part: I never claimed Bowser was most iconic, just that he was more iconic than Ganondorf and Sephiroth. You've been arguing with something I never said in the first place.