facher83 on 27 December 2007
Which is sad - I don't think PS3 had to compete the way they tried to against XBox360 - it probably didn't need all the shineys to go with it. PS2 did ABSOLUTELY FINE with lagging graphics behind XBox and GameCube. Sony really didn't need to 'beat out' Xbox360 in terms of hardware, let alone making it harder on developers to produce graphical games.
I say, if PS3 let up just a little on hardware that they might be a lot closer to 360 numbers today, instead of being 'on par' time-span-wise.
Numbers: Checker Players > Halo Players
Checkers Age and replayability > Halo Age and replayability
Therefore, Checkers > Halo
So, Checkers is a better game than Halo.
