Mr Puggsly said:
I'm just stating a fact. I know nothing will come out of you that will change my opinion. And from just reading your comment, I was clearly right. Your comments on the Move are clearly bias and sounds like advertising. You're trying to sell it as a great item for casual gamers, but I think casual gamers can figure out how to work a joystick. A joystick is also free with a PS3 and the standard input device. While the Move is a high priced item and will likely have poor sales. Trendy and interesting is what put the Wii on top this generation. I'd also argue the Wiimote doesn't work as well as originally advertised, but that doesn't seem to have hurt sales much. Its also a much cheaper option than the PS3 with Move bundle. So people looking for motion technology similar to the Move, might just want the cheaper and original version that's bundled with games. Looking like an idiot is dumb argument. And more of a reason why the Kinect will be a blast at parties or with drunk friends. |
You're trying to argue that I sound like an advertisement when you say stuff like that?
You also cite they Wii's cheapness as a benefit over the Move yet you ignore the even greater expense of Kinect? Don't call me biased and spit out crap like that; I've seen both sides of the argument and come to my own conclusions. How dare you call me biased!
I think that motion controls of any kind are more accessible for non-gamers, and that the Move is the best of the three, after experiencing what the Wii has to offer and watching dev diaries and gameplay videos for Move and Kinect.
You state that a joystick is free with the PS3 and that the Move is an extra expense which will cause it to sell badly, and yet you ignore the fact that this is equally true for Kinect and continue to sing its praises! You are the Oroboros my friend, a snake biting its own tail.
I survived the Apocalyps3










