| Crazymann said: I am not happy with Duke being on consoles due to console limitations*, but I would rather have it be included on consoles than not be released at all. * And by this I do not mean graphical limitations since the engine is not state of the art at this point anyway. I mean that Duke should get an AO rating, but we all know Gearbox will water it down for the M since Sonysoft (Microsony?) won't allow AO games on their consoles - lamers. If they would agree to release the full (uncensored) version for the PC along with the lamified console version then I'd be fine. For the record - as to the PC versus console battle above... My computer is a hexacore 980X with 12 GB ram, SSD and 5850. I use it for AV editing, the games I play on it most these days are Starcraft 2 and Diablo 2 (which don't require even a eighth of it's power). And I play my Wii far more than my PS3. This should illustrate that personal taste in fun far outweighs technical specifications anyway. So, why the heated argument?
|
@bolded: I didn't even think about that until you reminded me... This really sucks, luckily on PC we can patch lamified games, like I did with Fallout 2, as the gaming magazine I got it with had bundled the UK version, IIRC...
