Hynad said:
What a sorry excuse. There's no proof pointing to the opposite either. One thing is sure, if you start doing something, and give the work to someone else to finish, midway through the process, there IS going to be an apparent shift in consistence.
Start a drawing and give it to me to finish once you're half-way through it, explaining to me what was your idea and concept. I can assure you it won't be the same as you had first imagined when I'm done with it |
Um that's what implied previously. You're trying to make it seem like I said Matsuno's version would have been worse. Which I did not say. Plus either side is a flimsy argument. That's my point.
"Pointing out flaws and saying Matsuno would've fixed them is from a completely one-sided viewpoint, as some of the flaws could have been originally caused by matsuno and Ito fixed some of them."
my point is the game is what the game is. Yes, the game was not exactly matsuno's vision, but there's no way to prove matsuno's vision was better or worse. Just because someone has a vision doesn't make it good.
My argument has always been there's no way to know what would have been better. which is a fact.
Even if they released matsuno's vision. If it was better than Ito/Matsuno version is an opinion
