Kasz216 said:
CrazyHorse said:
Well actually I didn't ignore anything of the sort as it was never mentioned. I was simply responding to your points which to me seemed to be applying one set of rules to one variable but not to another. You seem to have misunderstand the point of my posts (as perhaps I did with some of your yours, it isn't exactly easy to talk about this kind of thing on a message board!). I wasn't trying to completely dismiss the idea that it is possible for a creater to exist (concious or otherwise), rather that I believe you were wrong to invoke the necessity of such a creator.
Regardless of what is said in the book I fail to see how that affects any of my arguments.
|
I never did invoke the necessity of a creator. Simply that there is little to suggest it isn't necessary at present.
It's silly to talk in absolutes when you don't know absolutely everything.
|
Ok well we're probably actually not too far apart in opinion all things considered then. I would agree that we can't rule out a creator but I would also argue that the necessity of one is far from needed (something we obviously disgree on).
I completely argee with your last sentance and in fact that was what I was trying to suggest with my previous posts when suggesting a creator isn't necissarily needed.
