Hephaestos said:
you didn't understand a thing to my hammer example.... 1) the planes hit.... destroy 5-6 floors. 2) it burns for 45 mins 3) weight of top floors is too great for weakened material (both plane crash and burning weakened the 5-6 floors) 4) the 5-6 floors collaps 5) The 30 floors ABOVE the crash site are still intact, but they have nothing under them now, so they fall 6) the 30 floors abonve hit the rest of the tower, acting as a gazzilion ton hammer (the mountain). 7) everything shaters as the shockwave goes down the building 8) as it falls, the top of the tower encounters little resistance from the shockwaved shattered structure and seemingly freefalls, it falls just about as fast as the shockwave propagates. Notice how the amount of smoke increases and comes always from under the falling part?
If that doesn't help you understand the processus... then just forget I said anything.... |
Or to put it another way... say you work at a wharehouse.
You have a number of pallets stacked on top of each other, each with a layer of boxes.
The boxes will be fine regardless of the weight because of how they were put on each other.
You can remove pallets near the top few by simply pulling them out. They can handle the weight.
If you need to remove one of the bottom pallets though... or even medium pallets... well... you gotta take apart the whole thing.
If you use your palet jack to pull out that palet... (And hold the rest in place by hand) It's gonna crush all the boxes under it. All of the layers of boxes.
It's basic physics. It's why people who have actual arhitectural degrees don't question a plane felling a tower.
Let alone people who stack pallets in wharehouses.








