ConnorJCP said:
slowmo said:
ConnorJCP said:
slowmo said:
Branko2166 said:
Not a bad video. Only one score I disagree strongly with and that's in the graphics department.
Was kinda lolz worthy that 2 guys scored the graphics on the ps3 and 360 equally. But I suppose it's opinion based ultimately.
|
Mulitplats generally are as good or better on 360, a handful of PS3 exclusives look better than anything on the 360. When you weigh up the difference be thankful they gave the PS3 the same score as the vast majority of titles look as good or better on the 360.
|
i hate it when people say it balances out because some multi-plats, occasionally, look better on the 360,
thats like saying a country that won gold,silver,bronze in a Olympic game is overall about as good as a country that gets 3rd 4th and 5th.
its about the winners, not the failures.
|
You might have a point if your analogy was even remotely close to what I said. It is more like saying a country that won just 3 gold medals is better than one that won 15 silvers and 30 bronzes. In that example which is far more accurate your "hate" seems rather biased to suit an agenda you have imo.
For the record I didn't say the guys opinion was wrong, I stated depending on how you weighted each example he could have scored heavily against the PS3 so should be grateful he didn't.
If it's about the winners then the 360 has FAR more than the PS3 in graphical comparison stakes.
|
The country with 3 gold medals still has the 3 best, thus it has the best (insert any sportsman).
|
Shame the 3 best were in hockey, equestrian and archery but hey your opinion don't hurt me.
