Seece said:
leatherhat said:
Seece said:
leatherhat said:
Seece said:
zzamaro said:
can M$ be more greedy?
I don't understand how some X360 fans can defend Micro$oft kn this one.
|
IN-FLA-TION
MS have actually been pretty giving over the past few years when you think about it.
|
My mind is absolutely blown. The only company charging for online services is being "giving." I feel like I should be angry by your statement but it confuses me so much I don't know what to say.
|
Why should it anger you in anyway?
MY mind is blown so many PS3 fans take it upon themselves to make it an issue.
|
Online is a free service buddy, always has been. As a PC gamer its just further proof of how horrible MS is for gaming as a whole. And I'm angry about your statement. Its like saying that someone shoving half his dick up your ass is being generous for not putting the whole thing in.
|
Clearly not.
MS is horrible for gaming? I don't see it affecting PS3 online gaming, or PC? It must just be horrible for X360 owners, but the majority are fine with this??? You're looking for weak excuses.
Why use that anology btw?
|
Oh it has, until MS realized it could scam children and people who didn't know much about games for easy profit.
All that DLC stuff? Who do you think brought that into the world? MS.
Because you are getting ass raped.
You seem to have the mindset that more money for MS= more games or more features. But thats not how it works. More money for MS= more money for MS execs, thats how it works. Look at nintendo and sony, free online- but they make way more games for their system. So where is this live money going? Clearly not into making games.
