Is it just me or is the 360 low on exclusives in 2011 vs the PS3?

[ironman]

Doobie_wop said:

ironman said:

leo-j said:

yes I am serious, because GAMETRAILERS said halo reach isn't that good

(IN FACT the editor in chief, SHANE SATTERFILED... yea I know.. said he found the game behind compared to another shooter on another console)

so that made it serious... ...serious

Ah yes, and because Gametrailors said so it must be true. Seriously, if it really has all the content Bungie says it does, and if the campaign is anything like it looks, and if the multiplayer is anything like the Beta...well then the guys over at Gametrailors are idiots.

They've most likely played the proper game, you haven't, so the thing's they say have alot more credibility than us forum goers. The Halo: Reach praise so far from the general gaming media hasn't been universal, so I wouldn't call the guys at GameTrailers idiots just because they disagree with your unproven opinion. That's not cool. I also don't think Leo-J should have brought Halo" Reach up, but he didn't call the guys at GameTrailers idiots.

From what I have experianced, I do think they are idiots. Just the content alone, Forge world, the new maps, loadouts, multiplayer sorting options, gametypes, and ranking systems alone say that this will be head and shoulders above the rest.

Anyway, In LeoJ's defense, he was not the one who brought reach into the conversation.