By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ironman said:
leo-j said:

yes I am serious, because GAMETRAILERS said halo reach isn't that good

(IN FACT the editor in chief, SHANE SATTERFILED... yea I know.. said he found the game behind compared to another shooter on another console)

so that made it serious... ...serious


Ah yes, and because Gametrailors said so it must be true. Seriously, if it really has all the content Bungie says it does, and if the campaign is anything like it looks, and if the multiplayer is anything like the Beta...well then the guys over at Gametrailors are idiots.

They've most likely played the proper game, you haven't, so the thing's they say have alot more credibility than us forum goers. The Halo: Reach praise so far from the general gaming media hasn't been universal, so I wouldn't call the guys at GameTrailers idiots just because they disagree with your unproven opinion. That's not cool. I also don't think Leo-J should have brought Halo" Reach up, but he didn't call the guys at GameTrailers idiots.



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752