First off, I think it's pretty sad that this is even a topic. With that being said, your given examples seems just way, way, WAY... stupid?:
BioShock: Infinite? First of, BIoShock went multiplatform a long time ago and the game's scheduled for 2012 not 2011. Why would they take the franchise several steps backwards once again?
GTAV? Yeeeeaaaah, no comment... Well, actually: Why would Rockstar want to take many steps backwards just to cater to MS and their dollars? I think they will earn more AND make a MUCH better product if they have the PS3 (exclusive) in mind when making the game. Didn't they already complain about 360's limitations while working on GTAIV? Expect GTAV to be a PS3 exclusive if anything..
Splinter Cell? I thought since SC was born on the XBox, and since they used this argument for keeping SC:C exclusive, this was a series that doesn't need to be moneyhatted. I might be wrong though.
Prototype 2? Be my guest...
I don't think MS will be able to buy exclusive rights to any noteworthy 3rd party game ever again. They might get some Kinect games and that's it. More and more developers start enjoying developing for the PS3, and PS3 consumers have become too many to ignore. Perhaps MS should start thinking about making their own games if they want exclusives from now on. It would be a nice change.
