joeorc said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
at first i didn't think you where serious, but the lack of first and second party studios is one reason(and i have plenty others)i don't own a 360 now. without reliable dev. teams making hardcore games i don't see how they can keep the hardcore gamer, and 3rd party exclosives aren't guaranteed next gen so it begs the question what will MS do? they will have the IP's, but will they have hardcore IP's. relying on the casual market next gen maybe a big mistake for the big 3 cause the casual market isn't garenteed next gen so they will haft to appeal to the hardcore gamer more to secure them in there ranks.
on the other hand when 360 started having masive failure rates i thought it was over for them then, but look at where they are! it's hard to gage the 360 fan base, so counting MS out this gen or the next is not a wise move.
i personaly think the big 3 see the hardcore market as the most important and the onlyone they can rely on, but your question is better gaged to MS and Sony eventhough it doesn't seem as if Sony give a flying hoot about Move! i beleive Move is important to them(as we know Kinect is for MS), but is it something they trust and beleive will be usefull next gen, or thats it's a hit or miss. i think thats the real question?
|
i do think that Sony does see Move as very important, the reason being Sony is treating Move as another platform for game development for the PS3. An for Developer's to use as a way to make unique games that work much better than standard Game pads.
the Fact that already RTS games benefit on Game consoles from the use of Move does show one of the area's that game consoles have laxed in the past gain a new footing on this generation with a control system like the Move.
|
i see your point. move could open doors Wii couldn't or just were't tried with Wii. in the greater scheme of things move could show more potential then previously thought and maybe some gamer perception?
