JHawkNH said:
Xbbjf9s said:
JHawkNH said:
BTW, in your example about the cabbie that was attacked...
The cabbie was opposed to the building of the mosque near ground zero and the attacker was part of a group that was supporting the building of the mosque.
Truth is stranger then fiction.
Oh, and when you put some drunk idiot urinating in a mosque and shooting his racist mouth off on the same level as those who kill innocent people by blowing themselves up and flying planes into buildings, then the world really has lost it's mind.
|
Did the people in the california mosque destroy the tower? no they didn't.
I never said they did. You were the one putting the drunk urinating guy on the same level as the terrorists who caused 911. You were the one who said "The only terrorists that I see are non muslims"
Read the news buddy the cabbie stated that the mosque did not come up in the convo, he said the guy attacked him after he learned he was muslim.
That was my point! The artical tried to use this story as if the attacker was against the mosque and attacked the muslim cabbie because of it. But that was not the truth.
|
|
When you are disbturbing innocent people in their place of worship your just as low garbage is garbage. Lets be real here, we both know it has something to do with what is going on...he walked into a mosque and started calling them terrorists.
Where does the article state that? It just says that he stabbed the cabby after asking if he was muslim, the stabber works for a group that supports the mosque building. Are you looking at the other post I made? More info has been added since then I just haven't gotten around to posting it...http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38861763/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
Where? It says that the stabber worked
