By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Xbbjf9s said:
JHawkNH said:

BTW, in your example about the cabbie that was attacked...

The cabbie was opposed to the building of the mosque near ground zero and the attacker was part of a group that was supporting the building of the mosque.

Truth is stranger then fiction.

Oh, and when you put some drunk idiot urinating in a mosque and shooting his racist mouth off on the same level as those who kill innocent people by blowing themselves up and flying planes into buildings,  then the world really has lost it's mind.

Did the people in the california mosque destroy the tower? no they didn't.

I never said they did.  You were the one putting the drunk urinating guy on the same level as the terrorists who caused 911.  You were the one who said "The only terrorists that I see are non muslims"

Read the news buddy the cabbie stated that the mosque did not come up in the convo, he said the guy attacked him after he learned he was muslim.

That was my point!  The artical tried to use this story as if the attacker was against the mosque and attacked the muslim cabbie because of it.  But that was not the truth.