theprof00 said:
You wouldn't call these protests terrorizing? When you see the hate on these people's faces, I'm sure it terrorizes the shit out of the other side, who haven't done anything wrong. They try to control the actions of others through fear. That's the basic definition of the word. Why haven't they been protesting the mosque that's already right there? How do you quantify that into a value? Where is the line? How many people do you need to have, and how mentally imbalanced do they need to be? If there is one person suffering, does that qualify? Because of the undefinable nature of your evidence, I find it hard to take into consideration. I believe that those people should be allowed to live happy lives, but by your earlier statements comparing one level of violence to another and implying that it wasn't a big deal, they should deal with it. Right? |
You do realize your entire arguement in this paragraph has boiled down to "I think the protests are terrorizing... I want everybody to live happily without being terrorized... so let them build this building that will terrorize people."
You're arguement has a HUGE double standard in it.
They haven't been protesting the mosque that's already there because it's
A) Not 15 stories tall.
B) Not going to be visible from ground zero and the most popular access point of ground zero.








