--OkeyDokey-- said:
"only hardcore 360 and PS3 fans think their games look amazing" |
I admit that that comment was too blunt, but I didn't change my tune. My point all along was that in a technical sense, PS3 and 360 games are not impressive at all when compared to PC games (mostly their direct counterparts ie. multiplatform games or same-genre games).
In this industry, gamers and journalists debate about which game has the best graphics, and often Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2 are used to prove the PS3 is "graphics king". Why not throw Muramasa or Super Mario Galaxy in there? Because the Wii is underpowered? Well, so are the 360 and PS3.
Uncharted 2 looks amazing. God of War 3 looks amazing. That is my opinion. However, those games shouldn't be compared to PC (or Wii) games. When someone says Crysis 2 on PC looks better than on PS3/360, it's stating the obvious and shouldn't be news-worthy. Ofcourse PS3 and 360 are underpowered machines. Everyone knows it. But mostly the fanboys are out of touch with reality and argue that the PS3 and "teh cell" are the most powerful hardware around. It isn't.
tldr: PC is much more powerful than consoles, but it don't matter because art direction determines how pretty a game looks. Arguing about console power is useless and sad.








