--OkeyDokey-- said:
Chrizum said:
serav said:
Chrizum said:
And we didn't know that? Only hardcore 360 and PS3 fanboys think their games look amazing. Gears of War 2? Uncharted 2? Don't look that impressive at all. Killzone 2 could be done on PCs 4 years ago.
|
killzone 2 was done 4 years ago, released 2 years ago.
they even keep the same graphics and add 3d , and from the rumors maybe co op
|
It was released 1 year ago, and no of course it wasn't done 4 years ago, otherwise they'd have released it 4 years ago. Games on PC in 2006 looked better than games releasing now for the PS3 and 360. Nothing wrong with that, I think even many Wii games look great today (hell, I prefer some 16-bit games to recent games visually).
It's just sad when you see PS3 and 360 fanboys arguing over which game is the "graphics king" when it's all been done before ages ago on PC.
|
Um, how about no? Gears of War looked better than everything on PC when it released in late 2006 and it took the original Crysis to top it. And Uncharted 2, God of War III and Gran Turismo 5 look as good as any non-Crysis game out there to this day.
K?
|
I respect your opinion. I think Muramasa on Wii looks better than any PC game ever released. But that's not the point I'm trying to make. Technically, Uncharted 2 and God of War 3 are miles behind PC games, even when you don't count Crysis. There were tons of games that were technically more advanced than Gears of War in 2006.
Hell, Oblivion on PC looked about 10 times better than Oblivion on consoles. With some good mods enabled, it trounces each and every console game so far released.
