| vlad321 said: Going by the official site, this is still PC too, so it is an extremely misleading title. That said, DS2 was pretty crappy and DS1 was just ok at best. I highly doubt this will be any good of a game honestly. |
I agree. the Siege series is just bland. It's an uninspiring series of games from Gas Powered Games. Though to the credit of the GPG. I have found that DS was more tech demo for their engine than a good game. The engine was magnificent and could with effort replicate any RPG or Diablo like game. The problem was that the engine was in a swamp mix of Diablo clone and generic. Making the ability to do much more than map making an incredibly difficult exercise. I remember when NWN nights came out their was much fan developer debate. DS in the end trumped NWN engine, but it would be going back to the drawing board in regards to much of it.
As I see it. If DS3 is anything like DS1&2. It's going to be pretty graphics wrapping mediocre game play. I've been burned 3 times on with Siege. I won't bother with a 4rth.
Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.
