By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
Squilliam said:

A. Some people seem to forget that.

B. They do need to be reminded, all of the time. Almost all of the talk about console games seems to take a psudo technical angle when talking about visuals when what really needs to be praised is artistry and talent. Answer me this, who got more praise for Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2? Was it the PS3 or was it the teams whom made the game? I'll be surprised if you say the latter. It all depends on the context, if people use the wrong one then does it surprise you when they are corrected?

Doesn't matter who praised Uncharted 2 or Killzone 2, unless you have an inferiority complex. And if we get real technical, the industry itself hyped Uncharted 2's & Killzone 2's visuals as "the best on CONSOLES", right along with the 'fanboys' you seem so quick to call out. And saying: "PC games look better than console games" well no shit, who argued that they didn't? But in many graphics discussions, PC fans feel obligated to "trash the consoles", which can be down right annoying.

Regardless, no matter who's doing it, it remains an elitist way of thinking, which you seem to support.

Graceful sidestep. Let me remind you of what I said: "Answer me this, who got more praise for Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2? Was it the PS3 or was it the teams whom made the game?" However theres a fundamental difference, the industry in this case got it right and they more often praised the developers. The elitist PC gamer also praises the game and developer in almost all cases, noone says that it was all due to their fancy graphics card and overclocked CPU. The people who were called out got it wrong and they praised the wrong thing in the wrong way. Its not wrong to correct such talk, is it?

In any case, anyone who doesn't fall into the above is probably a troll.



Tease.