Smidlee said:
selnor said:
snfr said:
selnor said:
zgamer5 said:
they are overdoing everything. the content looks good. and the bluray one is just ridiculous.
|
But true LOL.
Reach wins on every point in the OP. Not on one single point can anyone say with a straight face that Reach isnt the leader and innovator.
And I still want to know why BluRay games are not keeping up with DVD games for content. Noone seems to be able to answer this question.
It wasnt answered with Halo3. And well Reach beats out alot of retail games in their own fields. And yet is one game. A game with so many features and so much content that to be honest, it makes other single genre games look bland.
|
Have you lived under a rock when all this GT5 stuff was announced? Or when FF XIII was superior because of Blu-ray? Ok, the second one is not for content, but you probably know what I mean. But I expected a post like this from you and Torillian pretty much said what I think.
Anyway, there are probably 2-3 points in that list which I would consider correct, the rest is just dump, that's why I consider it a joke article.
|
Funnily enough, the article is a joke article. But the odd thing is it's also got valid points on all of them.
I haven't read anything here why BluRay is needed apart from the lossless audio, which frankly unless you have paid out for a good seperate system is pretty pointless.
...
|
I know one example ; Forza 3. If Forza 3 was on Blu-Ray I wouldn't have to buy a HDD for the full game. (no problem as i was planning to buy at least a 20 GB HDD) No doubt GT5 will take more space than even FM3 so I'm gald it's on one Blu-ray disc)
|
Having an extra 2.8 gb on your HDD is hardly a reason to need 50 gb. Forza 3 tally's around the 10.6 gb mark. Although it has less cars ut of the box than say GT5. t has over 30 tracks more. As it comes with 112 tracks.
