selnor said:
snfr said:
selnor said:
zgamer5 said:
they are overdoing everything. the content looks good. and the bluray one is just ridiculous.
|
But true LOL.
Reach wins on every point in the OP. Not on one single point can anyone say with a straight face that Reach isnt the leader and innovator.
And I still want to know why BluRay games are not keeping up with DVD games for content. Noone seems to be able to answer this question.
It wasnt answered with Halo3. And well Reach beats out alot of retail games in their own fields. And yet is one game. A game with so many features and so much content that to be honest, it makes other single genre games look bland.
|
Have you lived under a rock when all this GT5 stuff was announced? Or when FF XIII was superior because of Blu-ray? Ok, the second one is not for content, but you probably know what I mean. But I expected a post like this from you and Torillian pretty much said what I think.
Anyway, there are probably 2-3 points in that list which I would consider correct, the rest is just dump, that's why I consider it a joke article.
|
Funnily enough, the article is a joke article. But the odd thing is it's also got valid points on all of them.
I haven't read anything here why BluRay is needed apart from the lossless audio, which frankly unless you have paid out for a good seperate system is pretty pointless. The PS3 games Ive experieced like MGS4 with lossless audio sounded no better than a 360 through Dolby 5.1 on a normal £300 theatre system. The difference is negligble. Unless you spend the money.
The graphics talk is very weak considering the amount of detail and varying look of the singleplayer not to mention the size of the levels.
I would like to add though. We dont know the game is 1 disc. I predict it will be on 2 discs.
|
Ok so its not confirmed to be on one disc. With the amount of content Reach has it almost has to be on 2 discs minimum.
