By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
yo_john117 on 19 August 2010
Edit Thread
SmoothCriminal said:
BenVTrigger said:
SmoothCriminal said:
BenVTrigger said:
yo_john117 said:
SmoothCriminal said:
Chairman-Mao said:

I


AA3 I've addressed. AA2 was far superior, but it's not this gen so I can't include it.

No one seems to respect Fear, and I'm not sure why. The only reviewing site that seems to agree with me is Noobtoob.

Far Cry 2 I can see people not liking, but the overall quality and polish is undeniable.

UT3 is basically the same game as the original Unreal, which still reigns surpreme over all non-realistic shooters.

 

As far as Halo 3 was concerned, it was terrible. I'd seen better graphics on a Dreamcast, the story was cheesy, the gameplay tightness was gone, the level design was the only redeeming factor, and even that was worse than previous Halo games. I love Combat Evolved and Halo 2, but Halo 3 was just a huge disappointment.


I do like them, look at my Gamercard I beat every single game you mentioned but I just don't see how those games stack up compared to Halo 3 AT ALL, let alone Halo Reach.

FEAR is a fantastic series same with Half Life but to me neither one is comparable.

.....and you saw graphics better than Halo 3 on the Dreamcast? Any chance of someone taking you seriously was just lost.


Sonic Adventure 2. One of the most gorgeous games of all time. Do you know why? The devs knew the system inside and out. On a technical perspective it's not better, but I didn't say it was better technically, I said it had better graphics.

 

Also the fact that you said "look at my gamer card" lets me know you played the games on 360. Go play them on a PC that can handle them properly, and then we'll talk.

Hmmm lets see....

 

Just ridiculous >_>