By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rath on 18 August 2010
Edit Thread
TheRealMafoo said:
Rath said:

Not all entitlements are human rights, but that does not mean no entitlements are human rights.


If you consider the rights of man as laid out by the US founding fathers to be accurate (and I realize not everyone does, but I do), then any entitlement program that requires the effort of one person to be taken so it can be provide to another, is a violation of those rights.

Our founding fathers considered our time and energy to be ours. That's what liberty is.

Now there are rights as a condition of law. For example, you have as right to drive after the age of 16, provided you prove your capable. That's an entitlement, and thus a right, and does not violate anyones human rights.

Calling things like healthcare a right, means that right violates the liberty of the individual, unless you applied healthcare in a manner where only your efforts were consumed for the purpose of your care. If you take from a small group to provide for a large group, you have violated the liberty of that small group.

For me, Human Rights as laid out by our constitution trump any rights of law.


I generally consider the rights in the bill of rights to be fairly correct (except for the silly 'right to bear arms') but I certainly don't consider them complete. Also taxation of any from would violate your idea of human rights.