By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor on 18 August 2010
Edit Thread
theprof00 said:
Euphoria14 said:
selnor said:
theprof00 said:
selnor said:
theprof00 said:

I hope they are found guilty. You can plainly see the difference with the naked eye.

Really though, I just want them to lose so I an say that "according to law, ps3>360" XD


This is a very terrible statement. And will only entice a war on here.

The 2 versions are near Identical. There is minor differences, but very minor they are.

I hope Square Enix get away unscathed from this. It's the rest of the world that needs to wake up.

O_o??


Sorry, if you were joking. It didn't seem like it.

I think he made that response because you pretty much just defended false advertisement by hoping that S-E gets away unscathed, opening up the door for things like this happening again.

ROFL.

it was both actually, I was just joking, but the response was pretty amazing if you ask me. I'm sure I could find  a comparison thread's he's made showing a multi-plat compared to another and claiming one is better than the other.

For me, it's a non-issue who did it. It's obviously false advertising. It's like when a multiplat game is shown and then at the end it has the xbox logo and says "ONLY ON XBOX LIVE". But it's a multiplat game?!?! I mean, if they don't get lose for that, then they won't get lose to this lawsuit.

Advertising is so full of loop-holes and blatant lying anyway. I could care less. I mean juicy juice still says 100% real juice on it. Like wtf?

I dont get involved with multiplat proving. It's pointless and stupid. Yes it does exit a superior version. A fanboy I might be, but splitting hairs on multiplats I dont do. It's silly. They look the same to me with the naked eye. All multiplats. Unless I study the images frame by frame. Which I dont do whilst playing. 

I couldn't care less about an extra tree or something.