As for the Sexual invitation.
152. Every person who, for a sexual purpose, invites, counsels or incites a person under the age of fourteen years to touch, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, the body of any person, including the body of the person who so invites, counsels or incites and the body of the person under the age of fourteen years, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
In other words, talking really dirty to someone underage.
I'd of banned him too. He basically said it was ok to sexually assault people because they were catholics.
To everyone just assuming they wanted to be touched, what the hell is that about?
What gives you any indication of that? There is no mention of it at all in the article.
And people wonder why it's so hard for rape victims to come foward, Aside from the... massive psychological trauma.
His posts are generally off topic... and would be the same if you found an article that simply said.
"Deron Tyson was shot today"
and someone posted
"Plenty of people get shot because they desrve to because they are criminals or attack other people."
He assumed something negative about the victim for no reason.
