unknown_soul89 said:
lol going by VGC why don't you just get a random number generator, and I said take away the last year not the first, over time consoles lower price have more time to advertise and come out with more games, the fairest assessment is comparing respective years on the market so have 360 from 2005-2009 and ps3 from 2006-2010, not to mention the fact that ps3 sells more on average per year |
But its not the fairest assessment. We could go back and forth about what the fairest assessment is. For instance, based on EXPECTATIONS, the PS3 was expected to blow away the 360 and Wii prior to launch. People were calling it the Dreamcast 2. And that makes sense, as the previous Playstation consoles were not only market leaders but DOMINATED with sales of over 100 million consoles each. So wouldn't being fair include that the underdog 360 has impressed by not only outselling its predecessor immensely but by NOT giving up any lead to the 3rd console of the Playstation legacy?
That's why I stated what I stated before: they are both selling good right now, so why take pot shots at them? The PS3, as the 3rd place console, will shortly have sold better than any 2nd place console before it. This gen has been an impressive feat overall. As gamers, isn't that what we should be excited about?