dtewi said:
Icyedge said:
dtewi said:
I find it funny.
Perhaps this game should have been Called Lost Odyssey and Lost Odyssey should have been called FF13.
Lost Odyssey has everything Final Fantasy 13 doesn't but should. Mini-games, sidequests, open exploration of the ENTIRE world, and music by Uematsu (Not to say FF13's music is bad, just Uematsu is a FF staple).
Anyway, I've played 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 and am playing 1, 6 and 12. This game ranks below all of them except 8 and maybe 4. It's not a bad game, just a poor Final Fantasy.
Bring back Squaresoft.
|
You forgot to mention the thing FF13 does better. Anyway FF13 shouldnt be Lost Odyssey, both games should be better. Between, theres sidequest in FF13. Just a tought since I played both, I think its longer to re-explore whats available in FF13 than re-exploring Lost Odyssey ENTIRE world :P.
|
Erm... is english your first language?
The only thing Final Fantasy 13 does better is the battle system.
And LO's world is larger than Gran Pulse.
|
What about numbers of different equipments/weapon and customisation. FF13 system is bigger on this aspect. Characters customisation is also bigger then LO skill system. Even if its not a game breaker FF13 presentation is better than LO. Im pretty sure its longer to explore gran pulse than LO, anyway, FF13 is longer. As you can see, theres a couple of strong points. It should be possible to find more strong points for both games. I think they are both good games that could be better. Reviewers also seems to be of that opinion LO 79% and FF13 83% metacritic. Not bad but not awesome either for both games. English is my third language.
